Provens v. Stark County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The plaintiff-appellant’s complaint alleged a violation of her state constitutional rights. Although she did not specify in her complaint what rights were allegedly violated, the thrust of the allegations indicate that Section 11, Article I of the Ohio Constitution was the major basis of plaintiff’s claims. This section provides:
“Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of the right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech, or of the press. * * * ”
*255This constitutional provision does not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. BouillionTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.