Legal Opinion

Provens v. Stark County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1992No. 91-1412PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The plaintiff-appellant’s complaint alleged a violation of her state constitutional rights. Although she did not specify in her complaint what rights were allegedly violated, the thrust of the allegations indicate that Section 11, Article I of the Ohio Constitution was the major basis of plaintiff’s claims. This section provides:

“Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of the right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech, or of the press. * * * ”

*255This constitutional provision does not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. BouillionTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API