Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Slusher v. City of Leavenworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 3, 2005No. 91,641PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

This is an action in mandamus to compel application of the statutory veterans’ preference in the promotions of William Slusher from sergeant to lieutenant and Ralph Sorrell from police officer to sergeant with the City of Leavenworth, Kansas, Police Department (LPD). Slusher and,Sorrell filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the district court alleging that each was denied promotion by LPD in violation of K.S.A. 73-201, a veterans’ preference statute, and seeking an order compelling LPD to promote them to the positions they applied…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Bruggeman Ex Rel. Bruggeman v. SchimkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Wilson v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Slusher v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Condemnation of Land for State Highway Purposes v. Stranger Valley Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Taylor v. KobachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Kearny County Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API