Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Slusher v. City of Leavenworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 14, 2007No. 96,414PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

This action in mandamus by William Slusher and Ralph Sorrell (relators) to compel the City of Leavenworth (City) to apply the veteran’s preference statute, K.S.A. 73-201, to promotions within the Leavenworth Police Department (LPD) returns to our court for a second time. See State ex rel. Slusher v. City of Leavenworth, 279 Kan. 789, 112 P.3d 131 (2005) (hereafter Slusher I). In this appeal, the relators complain that, although the district court granted them summary judgment with regard to the applicability of the veteran’s preference, it…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. LSF FRANCHISE REO I, LLC v. Emporia Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Wiechman v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. McAlister v. City of FairwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. TracySupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API