Legal Opinion

Rhoten v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 29, 2010No. 98,837PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

This appeal asks whether the doctrines of res judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion) bar plaintiff s negligence and negligence per se claims in state court against the City of Topeka and one of its police officers after those same claims were dismissed without prejudice in federal court. We hold these claims are barred and decline plaintiff s invitation to overrule Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc., 263 Kan. 388, 949 P.2d 602 (1997), cert. denied 525 U.S. 831 (1998), which found claim preclusion barred…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. MACTEC, Inc. v. GorelickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Mentor WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API