Legal Opinion

Morris v. Glaser

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 6, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a foreclosure suit in which the mortgaged premises have been sold pursuant to a final decree. The matter now comes before me on the return of an order to show cause why the final decree should not be opened and amended, issued on the petition of two infant defendants, one of whom has attained his majority since the final decree and foreclosure sale. For a correct understanding of the present application it is necessary that the previous proceedings be recited in detail.

The complainant was the holder by assignment of an $18,000 mortgage dated July 23d 1906, executed by one Simon Glaser…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ertag v. Cavallo Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Cona v. GowerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. In Re Wt Byrns, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
  5. Skovborg v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API