Legal Opinion
In Re Wt Byrns, Incorporated
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 14, 1966No. 23208PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.
Remaining for consideration in the above matter is the request for compensation for services allegedly performed by an attorney for the trustee under a deed of assignment who also served as attorney for the grantor corporation. By this Court’s memorandum order hereto fore entered on August 17, 1966, the question presented was stated to be—
“May an attorney who is in law partnership with his father, and who is serving as sole trustee under a deed of assignment, retain the legal services of the father as attorney for the trustee under the deed of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Alexandria Gazette Corp. v. WestSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- People ex rel. Livers v. HansonIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Sun B. L. Assn. v. RashkesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Swope v. BrattonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- In Re Colony Press, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- In Re Stancraft Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984