Legal Opinion
Figlar v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 1, 1947PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In this action Anna M. Figlar and Mary A. Liscinsky, each a minor bringing suit by her next friend, sued the three defendants for damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendants when the plaintiffs were run down by the defendant Gordon’s automobile as they walked across Stratford Avenue in Bridgeport on August 1,1943. The jury returned a verdict for each plaintiff against all of the defendants and all of them have appealed. The defendants The Connecticut Railway and Lighting Company and Garrabrandt, who is admitted to have been its agent acting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Rode v. Adley Express Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Neal v. Shiels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.