Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Woolery

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 23, 1994No. 582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES S. GETTY, Judge, Retired, Specially Assigned.

At the root of this appeal is a divorce action between Welvin C. and Bonita D. Goodwin, filed in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. The Goodwins were partners with Jesse Tucker and nine others in the ownership of twenty-three properties. All of the partners except Bonita Goodwin are the appellants (hereinafter the “partners”) in this appeal. In February of 1989, the court in the divorce action issued an order appointing the appellees, Benjamin Woolery and Paul Rosenberg (hereinafter the “trustees”), “Special Masters and Trustees…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. D'Aoust v. DiamondCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. (1997), Maryland Attorney General Reports1997
  4. D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API