Legal Opinion
D'Aoust v. Diamond
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 29, 2010No. 1708PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatricciani, J.
On April 7, 2008, appellant, Michelle D’Aoust, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Harford County, naming as defendants appellees Cindy Diamond, Bruce Brown, and Ro-sen Hoover, P.A.1 Appellees filed a motion to dismiss on June 26, 2008, which the court granted on September 29, 2009. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on September 30, 2009.
Questions Presented
Appellant presented three questions for our review, which we have consolidated, as follows:
Did the trial court err when it granted appellees’ motion to dismiss?
For the reasons set forth below, we answer yes. Therefore, we…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Milton McCray v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Parks v. Alpharma, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Anderson v. JosephCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.