Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Ambrose

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 1973No. 72-1472PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARIS, Circuit Judge

This case involves the question of the constitutional validity of Rule 56(b) (5) of the Rules of the District Court of the Virgin Islands which requires an applicant for admission to the Virgin Islands bar to allege and prove that if admitted he intends to reside in and to practice law in the Virgin Islands. The validity of Rule 56(b)(4) which requires at least one year’s residence before admission to the Virgin Islands bar and of Rule 56(d) which requires applicants for admission of the Virgin Islands bar to take a written examination, are also…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok PoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Martin v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
  4. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Lipman v. Van ZantDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1976
  2. Matter of FrazierDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1984
  3. Aronson v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. Charles A. Deason, Jr. v. United States District Court for the District of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Thorstenn v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API