Legal Opinion

Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1949No. 52PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

The appeal in No. 52, Stainback, Governor of the Territory of Hawaii, et al. v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po, An Eleemosynary Corporation, et al., and the petition for writ of certiorari in No. 474, a case with the same short title, seek review of a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. This judgment was entered by a special three-judge court that was called pursuant to Judicial Code § 266, and by that section’s provision was brought directly here on May 7, 1948, in case No. 52. To guard against a frustration of review by this Court’s refusal to accept jurisdiction, a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API