Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 10, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 91-1229PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
A jury convicted defendant in Phoenix Municipal Court of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Two principal issues are presented on appeal: (1) whether Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 28-692(A)(l) (driving under the influence) 1 and section 28-692(A)(2) (having a blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) of 0.10 within two hours of driving) 2 are unconstitutionally vague; and (2) whether section 28-692(A)(2) is unconstitutionally overbroad.
We hold that because A.R.S. sections 28-692(A)(1) and (A)(2) provide a person of normal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. CredifordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Bohannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.