Legal Opinion

State v. Hartley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1978No. 7824SC697PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendants moved to quash the bills of indictment for failing to sufficiently identify the property taken. The bills describe the stolen property as “a quantity of used automobile tires, the personal property of Jerry Phillips and Tom Phillips, t & d/b/a the Avery County Recapping Service, Newland, N.C. . . . having a value of over $200.00.”

Every person charged with a crime has the right to be informed of the accusation against him. N.C. Const, art. I, § 23. This provision is to enable the defendant to have a fair and reasonable opportunity to prepare his defense, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. McCave v. CrescimannoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API