Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 2016No. 15-615Published

1Dissent

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge, Dissenting.

I dissent. An indictment is the sine qua non of criminal jurisdiction as required by Article I, Section 22 of the Constitution of North Carolina. To indict, twelve to eighteen *46persons sitting as a grand jury have to concur in the indictment. N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-621. The language of an indictment is presented to the grand jury by a District Attorney pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-627. The purpose of Constitutional provisions for indictments is: "(1) to provide certainty so as to identify the offense, (2) to protect the accused from twice being put…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WestbrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. Ahmadi-TurshiziCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API