Legal Opinion

Pla Mor, Inc. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1948No. 31261PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The sole question presented is whether the Board of Tax Appeals acted unreasonably or unlawfully in affirming the decision of the Tax Commissioner that, the furnishing of shoe skates by the appellant to its customers in the manner stated was a “sale” within the meaning of Section 5546-1, General Code. That section provides in part as follows:

“ ‘Sale’ and ‘selling’ include all transactions whereby title or possession, or both, of tangible personal property, Js or is to be transferred, or a license to use or consume tangible personal property is granted, for a consideration in any manner,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pioneer Linen Supply Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbus Coated Fabrics Division v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Machinery Moving, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. American District Telegraph Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Morse Signal Devices, Inc. v. DonahueUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1967
  5. Randall Park Jockey Club, Inc. v. PeckOhio Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API