Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Bosworth
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1961PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.
In a malpractice action brought against an attorney at law by a named devisee, who was allegedly deprived of his devise as a result of defendant’s negligence in causing plaintiff to act as an attesting witness to the execution of the will, defandant moves for judgment under subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon. Since the argument of the motion the plaintiff has served an amended *1058complaint. By consent of the parties it is the amended complaint,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Tulloch v. HaseloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berman v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Weisberg v. Williams, Connolly & CalifanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Millwright v. RomerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Succession of KillingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Gilbert Properties, Inc. v. MillsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.