Legal Opinion
Tulloch v. Haselo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 11, 1926PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The complaint alleges that the defendant was a duly-licensed dentist; that in or about the month of January, 1921, defendant undertook, as such dentist, to pull plaintiff’s upper teeth; that ether was administered for the purpose; that during the operation and “ while plaintiff was under ether, no substance of any kind was placed by the defendant in plaintiff’s mouth to prevent any of the teeth from being swallowed by the plaintiff, or from going down her throat; ” that “ by reason of the careless and negligence and unskillfulness of the defendant in removing and extracting said teeth from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lightfoot v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Kuelling v. Roderick Lean Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Glover v. National Bank of CommerceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Clarke v. GilmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by39 opinions
- Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Johnson v. St. Patrick's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1966
- Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Seippel v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.