Legal Opinion
Weisberg v. Williams, Connolly & Califano
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 1978No. 12772PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
The trial court dismissed a complaint for legal malpractice filed October 21, 1976, by appellants Harold and Lillian Weisberg, against the law firm of Williams, Connolly & Califano. 1 Appellants claim on appeal that the trial court erred in determining that their malpractice suit was barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.
In Count I of the complaint, appellants asserted that they had retained appellees in February 1964, to prosecute claims against the United States government for alleged damage to them and their property caused by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. City of Burlington, VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Kohler v. Woollen, Brown & HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Burns v. BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.