Legal Opinion

Millwright v. Romer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 1982No. 66653PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

Plaintiffs Donna S. Millwright, James Markel Summers and Markel Summers appeal from summary judgment dismissing their legal malpractice action against defendant L. W. Romer. The single issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs’ action is barred by the statute of limitations. We find that it is so barred and affirm trial court’s summary judgment.

In reviewing the grant or denial of summary judgment motions, we view the underlying facts contained in the pleadings and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, and give to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Trobaugh v. SondagSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. Schreiner v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. Melissa Stender v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Neylan v. MoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API