Legal Opinion

Catanzaro v. Weiden

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 17, 1998No. 256, Docket 97-7140PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge:

This is a civil rights action by which the plaintiffs assert that defendants, City of Middletown, Mayor Joseph DeStefano, and Alfred Fusco, the Middletown Commissioner of Public Works (collectively the “City”), violated their due process property rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq. (“FHA”). The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that a municipality’s emergency decision to demolish perceived dangerous buildings could not be “repackaged” as a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Bonnie M. KERZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINGLY MANUFACTURING, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Johnson v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  4. Tellier v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Catanzaro v. WeidenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API