Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Jaloff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The disposition of this case involves the application and exposition of a statutory provision reading:

“No vehicle shall be parked upon the main-traveled portion of the highways of this state; .provided, that this shall not apply to any vehicle so disabled as to prohibit the moving of the same.” Subd. 19, § 2, Chap. 371, Gen. Laws of Or. 1921.

The defendant requested the court to give the following instruction:

“I instruct you that under the laws of the state of Oregon the parking of a vehicle on the main-traveled portion of the highway is prohibited. The language of the statute on that subject…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Colvin v. Auto Interurban Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kastler v. TuresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re John E. CorveyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. O'Brien v. RoyceOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Leveillee v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sandona v. City of Cle ElumWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Marinkovich v. TierneyMontana Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API