Legal Opinion
People v. Jackson
California Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1923No. Sac. No. 3396PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is a petition on behalf of Jim Jackson and Elizabeth Jackson for a writ of supersedeas directed to the district attorney, clerk and sheriff of Sacramento County to restrain the execution of a judgment rendered against petitioners by the superior court of that county. Respondent has filed a demurrer to the petition, without briefs or authorities, and no question of fact is raised.
The judgment was rendered in an action instituted by the District Attorney of Sacramento County under the “Red Light Abatement Law” (Stats. 1913, p. 20), and ordered that petitioners refrain from maintaining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Ex parte QueiroloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Haight v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ohaver v. FenechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- United States v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- West Haven Housing Authority v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
- Casasús v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
- California Real Estate Exchange v. Sequoyah Hills Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.