Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2002No. 49S00-0002-CR-104PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of murder 1 for the January 23, 1998, killing of Tamika Ballard in Indianapolis. The defendant appeals claiming insufficieney of the evidence, erroneous admission of an autopsy photograph, erroneous admission of evidence related to a gun that was not the murder weapon, and erroneous exclusion of a transcript of a witness's prior inconsistent statement. We affirm the trial court.

Sufficiency of the Evidence

The defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to show that she knowingly killed. In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, we will…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kiefer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. United States v. Sheri Lee McCradyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. WinchenbachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Summer Snow v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Helsley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Baer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API