Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 2003No. 41A05-0110-CR-467PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

This case might very well be illustrative of the old maxim, "penny wise and pound foolish," 1 with regard to whether an indigent defendant should be afforded public funds with which to retain an expert witness. - Appellant-defendant John Beau champ appeals his conviction for Battery Resulting In Serious Bodily Injury, 2 a class B felony, challenging the denial of his access to medical experts and the trial court's determination that several witnesses called by the State could testify. Beauchamp also urges that certain evidence was improperly admitted because the State had…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Christopher M. Stevens v. Daniel McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Camm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Camm v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Woodson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API