Legal Opinion
United States v. Winchenbach
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 7, 1999No. 99-1202PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises two important issues. One requires us to determine for the first time whether the police, equipped with a search warrant but not an arrest warrant, may enter the home and immediately arrest a resident on the basis of previously acquired probable cause. The second requires us to plot the line of demarcation between two closely related but poorly understood rules of evidence, Fed.R.Evid. 608(b) and Fed.R.Evid. 613(b). Concluding, as we do, that the arrest and the search conducted incident thereto were constitutionally permissible and that the trial…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Cox v. Maine State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Morelli v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Acosta v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Keith McGee Thomas King, Larone Brim, Harold McKinzie Tony Banks, Rabboni Smith, John Ector, and Flozell McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Oliver C. Udemba v. Paul NicoliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.