Boysen v. Petersen
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDb Graff, J.
’This is an action in tort, based on deceit. Plaintiff'in his petition pleaded both an oral warranty and a fraudulent representation. It is true that a warranty may be made the basis of fraud, provided that the plaintiff pleads it as fraud, and makes the necessary allegations to constitute fraud. See Hughes v. Funston & Smith, 23 Iowa 257.
Fraud, however, is distinguishable from breach of warranty. A warranty rests on contract, while fraudulent representation has no element of contract, and is essentially a tort. 1 Black on Bescission and Cancellation 46, Section 23. See, also, American Fruit…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Riley v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Davis v. Central Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Hinman v. TreinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Owens v. Norwood-White Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lockard v. CarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Sackett v. Farmers State Bank of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Commercial Savings Bank v. KietgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Stockdale AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.