Legal Opinion

Commercial Savings Bank v. Kietges

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 1928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The action is upon a guaranty dated January 23,1920, of all notes discounted by the Danbury Trust & Savings Bank to plaintiff, the Commercial Savings Bank of Carroll, “with or without recourse, said bank now hold- . mg $130,000 of paper made to the Danbury rprus^ & Savings Bank, which we do hereby guarantee and further guarantee all notes discounted in the future endorsed by Danbury Trust & Savings Bank without recourse.”

The guaranty is signed by four directors of the Danbury Trust & Savings Bank: Braig, Dúmig, Kietges, and Berger. Dumig is dead. His administrator and Kietges defend for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hetland v. BilstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Rudd v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Haigh v. White Way Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Washburn v. Inter-Mountain Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LENOX v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Turner v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. City of PrescottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Scheel v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Preston v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API