Legal Opinion
Anderson & Writer Corp. v. Hanky Beret, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 11, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I find the plaintiff’s patent No. 1,725,500 valid, that claims 7-11 thereof are infringed by the defendants, and I grant the preliminary-injunction pendente lite, for which the plaintiff prays.
The motion to dismiss the: bill of complaint is denied.
1. Patent No. 1,725,500, which will hereinafter be referred to as the Writer patent, was applied for on November 23, 1928, as a tam-pressing machine. The patent was granted on August 20, 1929, as United States patent No. 1,725,500.
The plaintiff corporation was incorporated under the laws of New York on November 26, 1928, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- United Shirt & Collar Co. v. BeattieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Milwaukee Printing Co. v. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1932
- Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1932
- Anderson & Writer Corp. v. KaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931