Perry v. Hayes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The declaration, after setting out that the plaintiff, by virtue of an agreement with the defendants Hayes and Gale, together with one Daggett and one Pye, became the holder of the greater part of the stock of the Canada-Atlantic and Plant Steamship Company, Limited, which he held subject to an obligation on his part to convey the same to the defendants Hayes, Gale and the said Daggett and Pye, upon their paying certain promissory notes held by bim against them amounting in the aggregate to $285,000, avers that Hayes and Gale, knowing that they would be unable to pay at maturity the said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Boston v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Converse v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Converse v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fleming v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Howland v. CornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Abbot v. Waltham Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Diver v. MillerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1929
- Lewis Invisible Stitch MacH. Co. v. Columbia Blindstitch MacH. Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.