Legal Opinion

Hood v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

This action was before this Court before. We find (Hood v. Mitchell, 204 N. C., 130), at page 135, tbe following: “The Corporation Commission of North Carolina, at tbe date of tbe injuries suffered by plaintiff, was, and tbe defendant, Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, as tbe successor of said Commission, is now in possession of tbe assets of tbe Commercial Bank and Trust Company of Gastonia, N. C., for purposes of liquidation as provided by statute. Tbe said Commission was, and tbe said defendant is now, a statutory receiver of tbe said Commercial Bank and Trust Company, with all tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Tousey v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Blades v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co. of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Scott v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. In Re LaFayette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Goodrich v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API