Legal Opinion

Scott v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The judgment of nonsuit, we take it, was based upon the theory that the contributory negligence of the intestate bars the plaintiff’s recovery of damages. Upon no other principle can we sustain the judgment in behalf of all the defendants. As the burden of showing contributory negligence ordinarily rests upon the defendants, we must decide whether the plaintiff’s evidence establishes this defense. If it does, the judgment must be affirmed.

In Covington v. Furniture Co., 138 N. C., 374, the Court, quoting Labatt, 333, gave the following statement of the rule which controls in the present ease:…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. State v. MayoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  3. Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Johnson v. Washington Route, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Covington v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Deaton v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Deaton v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Wright v. D. Pender Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API