Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Birotte v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 2009No. B213606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Lorenzo Birotte was charged with rape, forcible oral copulation and forcible sodomy more than 10 years after the crimes were committed and more than one year after a report first identified him by name as a suspect based on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haskell v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Birotte v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. MirmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API