Legal Opinion

Groves v. John Wunder Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1939No. 31,916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1] Reported in 286 N.W. 235. Action for breach of contract. Plaintiff got judgment for a little over $15,000. Sorely disappointed by that sum, he appeals.

In August, 1927, S. J. Groves Sons Company, a corporation (hereinafter mentioned simply as Groves), owned a tract of 24 acres of Minneapolis suburban real estate. It was served or easily could be reached by railroad trackage. It is zoned as heavy industrial property. But for lack of development of the neighborhood its principal value thus far may have been in the deposit of sand and gravel which it carried. The Groves company had a plant on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Seely v. AldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Morgan v. GambleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Chamberlain v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Laurin v. DeCarolis Construction Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Ylijarvi v. BrockphalerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API