Legal Opinion
Coppola v. Coppola
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 17, 1998No. SC 15715PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-72,1 the return date of civil process can be amended to *659correct the plaintiffs failure to return the process at least six days before the return date as required by General Statutes § 52-46a.2 The plaintiff, Eileen Coppola, appeals3 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that: (1) § 52-72 does not permit the amendment of the return date to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Andover LP I v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Snow v. CaliseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Packer v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.