Legal Opinion
Long v. Frank
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1992No. CV-90-3819PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Plaintiff pro se James Long filed his complaint in this age discrimination action in November of 1990. He alleges that the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service” or the “Agency”) terminated his employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623. As a result of this wrongful termination, Long seeks overtime pay with interest and compensation for the legal services he has received to date.
In this motion, the government, on behalf of Postmaster General Anthony M. Frank, asserts that Long’s age…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James A. Long v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Burrell v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
- Long v. FrankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.