Legal Opinion
Long v. Frank
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1993No. CV-90-3819PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The government moves this court to reconsider its Memorandum and Order dated December 23, 1992, 808 F.Supp. 961, insofar as that Order held that plaintiff’s ADEA action was not time barred. As provided in Local Rule 3(j), which governs motions for reconsideration, this matter has been taken on submission. Based on precedent that this court did not consider when issuing its prior order, the government’s motion should be granted.
FACTS
The procedural history of this action is set forth in this court’s Memorandum and Order of December 23, 1992, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stevens v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James A. Long v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Burrell v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
- Edwards v. ShalalaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- Jones v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993