State v. Evans
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Rat Stevees, Circuit Judge. Action for penalties for keeping a drug and pharmacy store in a village of more than 500 population, defendant not being, and not having in his employ, a registered pharmacist, as required by see. 1409y, Stats. 1898, as amended, and for, at the same time, permitting the retailing, compounding, and dispensing of drugs by a person, to wit, defendant’s son, not a registered pharmacist…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Rat Stevees, Circuit Judge. Action for penalties for keeping a drug and pharmacy store in a village of more than 500 population, defendant not being, and not having in his employ, a registered pharmacist, as required by see. 1409y, Stats. 1898, as amended, and for, at the same time, permitting the retailing, compounding, and dispensing of drugs by a person, to wit, defendant’s son, not a registered pharmacist and not under the charge of a registered pharmacist. The defendant and appellant, since 1884, has been a duly licensed and…
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.
The fundamental question raised is the constitutionality of our statutes regulating the practice of pharmacy, ch. 56a, Stats. 1898, with its amendments, and especially sec. 1409$, imposing penalties. Those acts, summarizing the elements important to this discussion, provide for the licensing of pharmacists and of assistant pharmacists, requiring for each a specified but different age and experience, together with diploma or examination by the state board of pharmacists. Sec. 1409# prohibits retailing or dispensing •of drugs, or the maintenance of any pharmacy therefor, in *384any town, city, or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Risch v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Black v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Adams v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. WhitcomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Kiley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.