Legal Opinion

State v. Whitcom

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1904PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge. Appeal from judgment against the defendant for a penalty of $100 and costs under sec. 1576, Stats. 1898, as amended by ch. 341, Laws of 1901, rendered by the trial court on agreed facts. Appellant was salesman for a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Wisconsin and maintaining a permanent store at Milwaukee, where it keeps for sale merchandise, including teas.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge. Appeal from judgment against the defendant for a penalty of $100 and costs under sec. 1576, Stats. 1898, as amended by ch. 341, Laws of 1901, rendered by the trial court on agreed facts. Appellant was salesman for a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Wisconsin and maintaining a permanent store at Milwaukee, where it keeps for sale merchandise, including teas. Defendant, a resident of Wisconsin, traveled from house to house in Madison with a single horse and wagon, taking orders for teas,…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

Our statute relating to the licensing and punishing of peddlers and transient merchants (secs. 1570 et seq., Stats. 1898, as amended by ch. 341, Laws of 1901) is an edifice of composite architecture, made up of a series of portholed turrets for ofíense against the obnoxious, and sheltered corridors to shield the favorites of the successive legislatures which have contributed to the conglomerate now under consideration. So far as any generalization of its labyrinthine details is possible, it provides that “no person” shall be allowed to peddle — “peddling” being defined so as to include the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API