Legal Opinion
Alper v. Clark County
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1977No. 8412PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
The principal issue presented is whether NRS 244.245 1 and NRS 244.250, 2 the Six Months’ Claims Statutes, apply to a claim for damages in an inverse condemnation proceeding brought by a property owner against a county. The district judge, in dismissing the complaint, held the statutes applicable and constitutional. The appellants, Arby W. Alper and Ruth Alper, who commenced this action, have appealed.
1. Appellants acquired in May 1959 a parcel of real property 225 feet wide and 1,000 feet long, located on the south side of Flamingo Road in Clark County. This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Willy H. Willis v. Thomas B. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- McElroy v. Kansas CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1884
- Otis H. Reed, Jr. v. Terrell Don Hutto, Commissioner of Correction, State of Arkansas, A. L. Lockhart, Superintendent, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Wren v. DixonNevada Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- County of Clark v. Bonanza No. 1Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
- County of Clark v. AlperNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- County of Clark Ex Rel. Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. BuckwalterNevada Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.