Karen Corp. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM J. DAY, Justice.
Appellant, Karen Corp., appeals the granting of summary judgment and attorney’s fees arising from a declaratory judgment action raising four issues: 1) the trial court erred in interpreting the contract upon which the declaratory judgment action is based and in granting summary judgment to Appellee, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, based on its interpretation of the contract; 2) the trial court made numerous procedural errors in granting the summary judgment; 3) the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Appellee because there is no…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Strange v. Continental Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- City of the Colony v. North Texas Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Shelton v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Wright v. Sydow, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- in Re Mark P. Hardwick, Individually and D/B/A Mark P. Hardwick Oil & Gas Properties and Mark P. Hardwick, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.