Legal Opinion
Danville Fire Protection District v. Duffel Financial & Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1976No. Civ. 36327PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
On this appeal by the Danville Fire Protection District from a judgment after a court trial in two consolidated matters, 1 the main question is whether the district was entitled to enforce against the builders the heat, smoke and sprinkler system requirements of its Ordinance No. 5 that are more stringent than those of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the county pursuant to the State Housing Law (Health & Saf. Code, § 17910 et seq.). We have concluded that the court below properly found that since 1970 the state had preempted the field pursuant to Health and Safety…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Lancaster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Bozaich v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City of Bakersfield v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cedar Shake and Shingle Bureau Chemco, Inc. Wesco, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Soderling v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Briseno v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- ABS INSTITUTE v. City of LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Lippman v. City of Oakland, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.