Legal Opinion
Briseno v. City of Santa Ana
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1992No. G011685PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
Under the Uniform Housing Code, adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17922, subdivision (a)(1), every dwelling unit in this state is required to have at least 1 room with a minimum of 120 square feet of floor area; other habitable rooms are required to have an area of at least 70 square feet; and in any room used for sleeping purposes, “the required floor area shall be increased at the rate of 50 square feet for each occupant in excess of two.” (Uniform Housing Code, § 503, subd. (b) [hereafter referred to as section 503].) So far, so good.
Respondent City of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Santa Barbara v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Santa Barbara School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. BarksdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Benito Acosta v. City of Costa MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Katz ex rel. S.S. v. Children's Hospital of Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Cedar Shake and Shingle Bureau Chemco, Inc. Wesco, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- College Area Renters & Landlord Ass'n v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- ABS INSTITUTE v. City of LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.