Central State University v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant Universities urge that the finding and order of .the Commission as to the reasonableness óf proposed rates and tariffs be reversed and remanded because either no evidence supports the finding, or the *177finding is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. Appellants submit that Ohio Bell failed to present any evidence regarding the cost of connecting telephones purchased from a non-Beli company to centrex lines over which Ohio Bell enjoys control.
The record in this cause, however, does include testimony from two witnesses before the Commission relating to the significant expense…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- General Motors Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Ohio Ass'n of Realtors v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979