Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1977No. 77-318PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The gas in controversy in the instant cause was purchased by East Ohio and delivered to its' customers prior to the April 27,1976, effective date of R. C. 4905.302. That statute prohibits the passing-through of certain costs of gas purchased by gas companies and natural gas companies.

The. costs that cannot be passed through from the utility to certain statutorily-identified consumers are the costs.of its “special purchases.” This prohibition is found in R. C..4905.302(B), which provides:

“A purchased gas .adjustment clause may not allow, and no such clause may be interpreted to allow, a gas…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Central State University v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Franklin County Welfare Rights Organization v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Masury Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. River Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API