Tate v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
I
The dispositive question before us in this case is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, Petitioner Brian Arthur Tate knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty to first-degree murder. After failing to seek leave to appeal his conviction following his guilty plea and failing to obtain requested postconviction relief, Mr. Tate requested that his postconviction matter be reopened pursuant to Section 7-104 of the Criminal Procedure Article of the Maryland Code (2001, 2008 Repl. Vol.) (" Crim. Proc. § 7-104"). Mr. Tate alleged that this Court's decision in State v. Daughtry , 419 Md.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Lovell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State v. PrietCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hemming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Tate v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020