Legal Opinion

Tate v. Campbell

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 7, 2020No. 8:19-cv-03217Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRIAN A. TATE, * Petitioner * v * Civil Action No. PWG-19-3217 WARDEN CASEY CAMPBELL and * THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND * Respondents * *** MEMORANDUM Respondents filed a Limited Answer to Brian A. Tate’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking dismissal of the Petition as time-barred, or if not time-barred, they argue the Petition contains claims that are procedurally defaulted and others that are unexhausted for which there remains an available state remedy for him to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API