Legal Opinion

Hemming v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 26, 2020No. 48/19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jonathan Hemming v. State of Maryland, No. 48, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Greene, J. CRIMINAL LAW — JOINT OR SEPARATE TRIAL OF SEPARATE CHARGES — BIFURCATION The Court of Appeals held, as a matter of law, that the trial court did not have discretion under Maryland Rule 4-253(c) to bifurcate the possession of a regulated firearm by a prohibited person counts from the remaining counts of the indictment—with the counts being decided by different factfinders within a single trial. CRIMINAL LAW — JOINT OR SEPARATE TRIAL OF SEPARATE CHARGES — BIFURCATION The Court of Appeals held that a trial…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. Gregory O. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. United States v. Clarence JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Marquez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  4. State v. BrandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API