Hemming v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Jonathan Hemming v. State of Maryland, No. 48, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Greene, J. CRIMINAL LAW — JOINT OR SEPARATE TRIAL OF SEPARATE CHARGES — BIFURCATION The Court of Appeals held, as a matter of law, that the trial court did not have discretion under Maryland Rule 4-253(c) to bifurcate the possession of a regulated firearm by a prohibited person counts from the remaining counts of the indictment—with the counts being decided by different factfinders within a single trial. CRIMINAL LAW — JOINT OR SEPARATE TRIAL OF SEPARATE CHARGES — BIFURCATION The Court of Appeals held that a trial…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Gregory O. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- United States v. Clarence JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Marquez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- State v. BrandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025