Legal Opinion

Range v. Gorosh

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1984No. Docket 74626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s denial of their motion for a directed verdict after reconsideration pursuant to a remand order of the Michigan Supreme Court. Range v Gorosh, 417 Mich 1059; 335 NW2d 649 (1983).

Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit to obtain damages for injuries received in an automobile accident which occurred on July 26, 1976. The defendants admitted liability, and thus the primary issue at trial was whether the injuries sustained by Mrs. Range amounted to the "serious impairment of body function” which constitutes a prerequisite to the maintenance of a tort action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Guerrero v. SchoolmeesterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. LaHoussse v. HessMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Williams v. McGowanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Esparaza v. ManningMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Kroft v. KinesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Farquhar v. OwensMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API