Legal Opinion

DiFranco v. Pickard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1986No. Docket Nos. 74692, 74867, 75263, 75299, 75811, (Calendar Nos. 6-10)Published

1Opinion of the Court

427 Mich. 32 (1986)

398 N.W.2d 896

DiFRANCO

v.

PICKARD

BURK

v.

WARREN

PAUPORE

v.

ROUSE

KUCERA

v.

NORTON

ROUTLEY

v.

DAULT

Docket Nos. 74692, 74867, 75263, 75299, 75811, (Calendar Nos. 6-10).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued January 16, 1986.

Decided December 23, 1986.

Robert C. Vandenbroucke for plaintiff DiFranco.

Philip C. Dean for plaintiff Burk.

Clancey & Price, P.C. (by Philip A. Clancey), for plaintiffs Paupore and Kucera.

Law Offices of Norman C. Halbower, P.C. (by James K. Oslund and Norman C. Halbower), for plaintiff Routley.

Lee E. Halsey for defendant Pickard.

Fraser, Trebilcock, Davis & Foster, P.C. (by C.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API