Legal Opinion

Kroft v. Kines

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1986No. Docket 85780PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant Kevin Ray Kines appeals, by leave granted, from a circuit court order denying defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)10). The dispositive issue on appeal is whether plaintiff Linda Kroft suffered a serious impairment of a body function. MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135. We find that she did not and reverse.

Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident on August 4, 1981. Plaintiff was taken by ambulance to the hospital. X-rays revealed that plaintiff suffered two comminuted fractures of the humerus. Her arm was set in a cast. She remained in the hospital for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Range v. GoroshMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arabo v. TurnbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API